Friday, December 8, 2017

Nancy Pincus Kangaroo Court in Session - Caught Once Again in a Web of Lies - Massive Fail

Nancy Pincus of the Grafix Avenger blog is once again caught red handed in a web of lies trying to unsuccessfully implicate me in wrong doing with respect to my 2011 Freeholder campaign. The reason for this is twofold in that I did not support her candidate for Mayor and because I reported out on factual information on the fact she received $1200 in services for her work as a paid political operative for The Ravi Bhalla for Mayor Campaign. Her allegations are false and defamatory and should be retracted in full. Knowing her bad behavior as of late I don't expect much from here and as a paid political operative of Ravi Bhalla it seems "scorched earth" is still the method of operation of Team Ravi even after the election. So much for Ravi Bhalla being a uniter. He needs to curb his paid for attack dogs if he wants to move forward that way.

Very little can be taken seriously from bitter Bhalla blogger Nancy Pincus these days so lets just have a little fun debunking her stupidity...


Nancy Pincus in her attack piece wrote the following regarding my ELEC filings during my Freeholder Campaign in 2011. She had provided voluntary professional services for my campaign for one palm card during the election:

"Imagine that, Kurt Gardiner, the beneficiary of my in-kindness in 2011 unlawfully skirted filing a C-1 report!"

Nancy Pincus' statement is false on two counts:

Count 1: I did indeed file my C-1 report. It was filed as the 48 hour report and is shown below:


Exhibit 1 - Nancy Pincus falsely accused me of not filing a C-1 report- here it is. 

Count 2: I did not need to file another C-1 report for what Nancy claims was in-kind work is actually not reportable. See below from the ELEC Compliance Manual for Candidates/Political Committees. Personal services provided on an unpaid, voluntary basis do not constitute a reportable contribution.

Exhibit 2- Not required to file voluntary professional services. Nancy lies again.

The conclusion is that Nancy Pincus is lying about my campaign in a deliberate attempt to defame me but if you want to get a laugh at my expense or better yet Nancy's , the lunatic actually sent me an invoice for her "volunteer work" six years later at inflated Super PAC prices. I rest my case in the Kangaroo Court of Nancy Pincus. Case Dismissed. Lol.

The lunacy of Nancy Pincus to send an invoice for volunteer professional services 6 years later.

Below is a screen shot of Nancy's defamatory hit piece. There is no scandal; it was fabricated out of thin air by Nancy Pincus. I demand a full retraction and a public apology but will likely not get one. This will be a litmus test for the Bhalla Administration to see if he can control his paid operatives from engaging in defamatory statements just score cheap political points and discourage honest discourse. Are you not entertained? I think its time to get back to the issues but I won't let people make false claims against me without putting up a defense. Have a great afternoon and a great weekend.


This hit piece is flat out defamatory and a full retraction with public apology is the only remedy at this point I seek. 



Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Login or signup now to comment.
I am under the impression that Ravi does want to work with the city council beyond just the two candidates on his ticket & an occasional 3rd vote from Russo.to accomplish things...(want to or he has to - it could be either one, I guess) Where I get concerned is that there doesn't seem to be any awareness that it wasn't just another tough election/contact sport - it was an election where the winner that spent a lot of the last 3 days of the election and the few weeks after talking about how hurtful it was that there was this terrorism flyer - yet - his campaign and largely white supporters were also, essentially, calling everyone else racists for not voting for him. AND, of course, there is the fact, now revealed that he compensated one of the loudest voices promoting that lie. It is irrelevant whether he paid her for that or palm cards. Why would he do business with someone that would promote such inexcusable nonsense?
Reply
2 replies · active 383 weeks ago
Suggestions to the effect I only wish to work with the underlings on my ticket are incorrect. Why just last Wednesday after the council meeting, Mikie Squared and I went out and had a great time. He knows I worked hard to make him council president.

If others will merely submit and announce fealty to my crown, I may compensate them greatly with a mayoral-elect executive blogger order.

"I the grand poobah-elect of Hoboken, having acquired 32.7% of the Hoboken vote hereby proclaim the immediate ceasing and desisting to all those who will not bend knee and bow to me being further shamed in called racist, bigot, fascist and Nazi.

This offer is good for 48 hours. On Monday, my paid political operative will return to shameless lying with abundant false and defamatory attacks. I pray all of you make the proper decision."

Signed,
The Crown Transactional Prince Elect
Reply
The "winner" sent out a massive number of flyers emphasizing he was a home grown Jersey Boy. After the election he promoted his religion to single himself out as something special. The two positions don't jive well.
Reply
certifiable!
Reply

Comments by